Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Gopal Trading Company Vs. Ravindra Kumar Goyal (RP) and Ors. - The Adjudicating Authority had rightly concluded that the intent behind filing the Section 9 application was not genuine in view of the fact that the Appellant who had initiated the Section 9 application, for inexplicable reasons, absented themselves from further participation in the CIRP proceedings including abstention from the filing of claims.
NCLAT (2026.03.17) in Gopal Trading Company Vs. Ravindra Kumar Goyal (RP) and Ors. [(2026) ibclaw.in 326 NCLAT, Company Appeal (AT) (Insol...
-
NCLAT (19.10.2023) in Mr. Rahul Gupta Vs. Chandra Prakash [Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 966 of 2022 ] held that; “The offences and...
-
NCLAT (2025.05.30) in Mr. Sunil Gutte Vs. Mr. Avail Menezes & Ors. [Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 515 of 2025] Tribunal in Pra...
-
NCLT New Delhi-II (29.07.2021) in Om Logistics Limited & Anr. vs. M/s Ryder India Pvt. Ltd. [IA. 2038 /ND/2020 in Company Petition No....
